Now:Suggest a Topic: Difference between revisions
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*CTA vs V/Q in pregnant pts needing PE r/o | *CTA vs V/Q in pregnant pts needing PE r/o | ||
*NEXUS vs. Canadian c-spine rules | *NEXUS vs. Canadian c-spine rules | ||
*[[EBQ:Nasogastric aspiration and lavage in emergency department patients with hematochezia or melena without hematemesis|Use of NG-lavage with upper GI bleeding]] | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
Revision as of 02:33, 11 February 2015
Background
This is the page to suggest controversial emergency medicine issues for us to pilot on WikEM-Now. The ideal (at least initial) topics are ones in which:
- there is true debate in the literature
- there currently lacks a clear management guideline
- and, in which doctors have to actually make a decision in real life.
The evidence may be unclear, but that does not stop us from having to choose an option. Theoretical debates are not of interest.
Potential Topics
- Post potential topics here, with link to EBQ page if currently present
- Octreotide for upper GI bleed
- Metoprolol vs. diltiazem in for A. fib with RVR
- Kayexelate for patients with hyperkalemia in renal failure
- tPA use in acute CVA
- tPA in PE subsets
- Discharge of Newly Diagnosed Pulmonary Embolism From the ED
- CTA vs V/Q in pregnant pts needing PE r/o
- NEXUS vs. Canadian c-spine rules
- Use of NG-lavage with upper GI bleeding