Likelihood ratios: Difference between revisions

Line 1: Line 1:
==Likelihood Ratio Approximate Change in Probability (%)==
==Likelihood Ratio Approximate Change in Probability (%)==


Values between 0 and 1 decrease the probability of disease
{| {{table}}
*0.1 −45%
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''LR'''
*0.2 −30%
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Post-Test Probablility Change'''
*0.3 −25%
|-
*0.4 −20%
| 9-10||45%
*0.5 −15%
|-
*1 - 0%
| 7-8||40%
 
|-
Values greater than 1 increase the probability of disease
| 6||35%
*2 +15%
|-
*3 +20%
| 5||30%
*4 +25%
|-
*5 +30%
| 4||25%
*6 +35%
|-
*7 8 +40%
| 3||20%
*9 10 +45%
|-
| 2||15%
|-
| 1||0%
|-
| 0.5||-15%
|-
| 0.4||-20%
|-
| 0.3||-25%
|-
| 0.2||-30%
|-
| 0.1||-45%
|}
*Values <1 decrease the probability of disease
*Values >1 increase the probability of disease




Line 22: Line 38:


Although this method is inaccurate for pretest probabilities less than 10% or greater than 90%, this is not a disadvantage, because these polar extremes of probability indicate diagnostic certainty for most clinical problems, making it unnecessary to order further tests (and apply additional LRs).
Although this method is inaccurate for pretest probabilities less than 10% or greater than 90%, this is not a disadvantage, because these polar extremes of probability indicate diagnostic certainty for most clinical problems, making it unnecessary to order further tests (and apply additional LRs).
<br>


==Source==
==Source==

Revision as of 14:07, 11 May 2016

Likelihood Ratio Approximate Change in Probability (%)

LR Post-Test Probablility Change
9-10 45%
7-8 40%
6 35%
5 30%
4 25%
3 20%
2 15%
1 0%
0.5 -15%
0.4 -20%
0.3 -25%
0.2 -30%
0.1 -45%
  • Values <1 decrease the probability of disease
  • Values >1 increase the probability of disease


An easy way to recall at the bedside by simply remembering 3 specific LRs 2, 5, and 10—and the first 3 multiples of 15 (i.e., 15, 30, and 45). An LR of 2 increases probability 15%, one of 5 increases it 30%, and one of 10 increases it 45%. For those LRs between 0 and 1, the clinician simply inverts 2, 5, and 10 (i.e., 1/2 = 0.5, 1/5 = 0.2, 1/10 = 0.1). Just as the LR of 2.0 increases probability 15%, its inverse, 0.5, decreases probability 15%. Similarly, an LR of 0.2 (the inverse of 5) decreases probability 30%, and a LR of 0.1 (the inverse of 10) decreases it 45%. These benchmark LRs can be used to approximate the remainder of Table 1.

Although this method is inaccurate for pretest probabilities less than 10% or greater than 90%, this is not a disadvantage, because these polar extremes of probability indicate diagnostic certainty for most clinical problems, making it unnecessary to order further tests (and apply additional LRs).

Source

J Gen Intern Med. 2002 August; 17(8): 647–650.