Spinal cord compression (non-traumatic): Difference between revisions
ClaireLewis (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(Expanded with concise EM-focused content: time-sensitive diagnosis, red flags, MRI urgency, steroid dosing, abscess distinction, disposition) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
*Most | *Non-traumatic spinal cord compression is an oncologic and neurologic emergency | ||
*Most commonly from '''metastatic cancer''' (breast, lung, prostate, renal, myeloma, lymphoma) | |||
*Site | *Site: thoracic spine (60-70%) > lumbar > cervical | ||
*The [[cauda equina]] | *Neurologic deficits may be irreversible if treatment is delayed — '''time is spine''' | ||
*The [[cauda equina]] begins at the L2 level; compression below this level produces a [[cauda equina syndrome|lower motor neuron pattern]]<ref>Cohen MS, Wall EJ, Kerber CW, et al. The Anatomy of the Cauda Equina on CT Scans and MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73 (3): 381-84.</ref> | |||
{{Epidural compression syndromes types}} | {{Epidural compression syndromes types}} | ||
==Clinical Features== | ==Clinical Features== | ||
*'''Back pain''' is the earliest and most common symptom (>90%) — often precedes neurologic deficits by weeks | |||
*Progressive weakness (typically bilateral) | |||
*Sensory loss below the level of compression (sensory level) | |||
*Bowel/bladder dysfunction (late finding — urinary retention, incontinence) | |||
*Gait difficulty | |||
{{Epidural compression syndromes clinical}} | {{Epidural compression syndromes clinical}} | ||
===Red Flags=== | |||
*Known cancer + new back pain (cord compression until proven otherwise) | |||
*Bilateral leg weakness | |||
*Sensory level on exam | |||
*Urinary retention or incontinence | |||
*Saddle anesthesia | |||
==Differential Diagnosis== | ==Differential Diagnosis== | ||
{{Spinal cord syndromes DDX}} | {{Spinal cord syndromes DDX}} | ||
{{Lower back pain DDX}} | |||
===Causes=== | |||
*'''Metastatic epidural disease''' (most common) | |||
*'''[[Epidural abscess (spinal)|Epidural abscess]]''' (fever, IVDU, recent procedure) | |||
*'''[[Epidural hematoma (spinal)|Epidural hematoma]]''' (anticoagulation, post-procedure) | |||
*Primary spinal tumor | |||
*Disc herniation (massive central herniation) | |||
*Vertebral fracture with retropulsion | |||
==Evaluation== | ==Evaluation== | ||
* | *'''MRI of entire spine''' is the study of choice — order emergently | ||
**If unavailable | **Image entire spine (may have multiple levels of compression) | ||
**If MRI unavailable: CT myelography | |||
*Bladder scan for post-void residual (>200 mL suggests neurogenic bladder) | |||
{{Epidural compression syndromes diagnosis}} | |||
===Labs=== | |||
*[[CBC]], [[BMP]], coagulation studies | |||
*[[ESR]], [[CRP]] (elevated in abscess, tumor) | |||
*Blood cultures if abscess suspected | |||
*PSA, serum protein electrophoresis if cancer workup needed | |||
==Management== | ==Management== | ||
*'''Emergent consultation''': neurosurgery and/or radiation oncology | |||
*'''Dexamethasone''': 10 mg IV bolus then 4 mg IV q6h (for malignant compression) | |||
**Controversial for non-malignant causes — consider risks<ref>Coleman WP, et al. A critical appraisal of the reporting of the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Studies (II and III) of methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury. J Spinal Disord 2000; 13:185.</ref><ref>Hurlbert RJ. Methylprednisolone for acute spinal cord injury: An inappropriate standard of care. J Neurosurgery 2000; 93(1 Suppl):1</ref> | |||
Acute Spinal Cord Injury Studies (II and III) of methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury. J Spinal Disord 2000; 13:185.</ref><ref> Hurlbert RJ | **Do NOT give steroids if [[epidural abscess (spinal)|epidural abscess]] suspected (will worsen infection) | ||
inappropriate standard of care. J Neurosurgery 2000; 93(1 Suppl):1</ref> | *Definitive treatment: emergent radiation, surgical decompression, and/or chemotherapy based on tumor type | ||
*'''Epidural abscess''': emergent surgical drainage + IV antibiotics | |||
*'''Epidural hematoma''': reverse anticoagulation, emergent surgical evacuation | |||
*Foley catheter for urinary retention | |||
{{Epidural compression syndromes management}} | {{Epidural compression syndromes management}} | ||
==Disposition== | ==Disposition== | ||
*Admit | *Admit all patients with confirmed or suspected cord compression | ||
*ICU if hemodynamically unstable or rapidly progressing deficits | |||
*Ambulatory status at time of diagnosis is the strongest predictor of outcome — patients who are still ambulatory have the best prognosis | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
*[[Epidural compression syndromes]] | |||
*[[Cauda equina syndrome]] | |||
*[[Spinal Cord Trauma]] | *[[Spinal Cord Trauma]] | ||
*[[ | *[[Epidural abscess (spinal)]] | ||
*[[Spinal cord syndromes]] | *[[Spinal cord syndromes]] | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 46: | Line 75: | ||
[[Category:Neurology]] | [[Category:Neurology]] | ||
[[Category:Orthopedics]] | [[Category:Orthopedics]] | ||
[[Category:Oncology]] | |||
Revision as of 00:44, 21 March 2026
Background
- Non-traumatic spinal cord compression is an oncologic and neurologic emergency
- Most commonly from metastatic cancer (breast, lung, prostate, renal, myeloma, lymphoma)
- Site: thoracic spine (60-70%) > lumbar > cervical
- Neurologic deficits may be irreversible if treatment is delayed — time is spine
- The cauda equina begins at the L2 level; compression below this level produces a lower motor neuron pattern[1]
Epidural compression syndromes
- Syndromes
- Causes
Clinical Features
- Back pain is the earliest and most common symptom (>90%) — often precedes neurologic deficits by weeks
- Progressive weakness (typically bilateral)
- Sensory loss below the level of compression (sensory level)
- Bowel/bladder dysfunction (late finding — urinary retention, incontinence)
- Gait difficulty
Epidural compression syndromes table[2]
| Syndrome | Spinal cord compression | Conus medullaris syndrome | Cauda equina syndrome |
| Location of lesion | Lesions at vertebral level L2 | ||
| Spontaneous pain | Unusual and not severe; bilateral and symmetrical in perineum or thighs | Often very prominent and severe, asymmetrical, radicular | |
| Motor findings | Deficits usually affect both legs but are often asymmetric | Not severe, symmetrical; rarely twitches | May be severe, asymmetrical, fibrillary twitches of paralyzed muscles are common |
| Sensory findings | Weakness in lower extremities, paresthesias/sensory deficits, gait difficulty | Saddle distribution, bilateral, symmetrical, disassociated sensory loss (impaired pain and temperature with sparing of tactile) | Saddle distribution (75% pts), may be asymmetrical, no dissociation of sensory loss |
| Reflex changes | Achilles reflex may be absent | Patellar and Achilles reflexes may be absent | |
| Sphincter disturbance | Bladder and rectal sphincter paralysis usually reflect the involvement of S3-S5 nerve roots | Early and marked (both urinary and fecal) | Late and less severe (60-80% pts) |
| Male sexual function | Impaired early | Impairment less severe | |
| Onset | Sudden and bilateral | Gradual and unilateral | |
| Other | Urinary retention with or without overflow incontinence (Sn 90%, Sp 95%) |
Red Flags
- Known cancer + new back pain (cord compression until proven otherwise)
- Bilateral leg weakness
- Sensory level on exam
- Urinary retention or incontinence
- Saddle anesthesia
Differential Diagnosis
Spinal Cord Syndromes
- Complete spinal cord transection syndrome
- Anterior cord syndrome
- Central cord syndrome
- Brown-Séquard syndrome
- Epidural compression syndromes
Lower Back Pain
- Spine related
- Acute ligamentous injury
- Acute muscle strain
- Disk herniation (Sciatica)
- Degenerative joint disease
- Spondylolithesis
- Epidural compression syndromes
- Thoracic and lumbar fractures and dislocations
- Cancer metastasis
- Spinal stenosis
- Transverse myelitis
- Vertebral osteomyelitis
- Ankylosing spondylitis
- Spondylolisthesis
- Discitis
- Spinal Infarct
- Renal disease
- Intra-abdominal
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm
- Ulcer perforation
- Retrocecal appendicitis
- Large bowel obstruction
- Pancreatitis
- Pelvic disease
- Other
Causes
- Metastatic epidural disease (most common)
- Epidural abscess (fever, IVDU, recent procedure)
- Epidural hematoma (anticoagulation, post-procedure)
- Primary spinal tumor
- Disc herniation (massive central herniation)
- Vertebral fracture with retropulsion
Evaluation
- MRI of entire spine is the study of choice — order emergently
- Image entire spine (may have multiple levels of compression)
- If MRI unavailable: CT myelography
- Bladder scan for post-void residual (>200 mL suggests neurogenic bladder)
- Emergent MRI
- If considering compression due to neoplasm obtain scan of entire spine
- Consider Bladder scan/ultrasound for bladder volume (post-void residual)
Labs
- CBC, BMP, coagulation studies
- ESR, CRP (elevated in abscess, tumor)
- Blood cultures if abscess suspected
- PSA, serum protein electrophoresis if cancer workup needed
Management
- Emergent consultation: neurosurgery and/or radiation oncology
- Dexamethasone: 10 mg IV bolus then 4 mg IV q6h (for malignant compression)
- Controversial for non-malignant causes — consider risks[3][4]
- Do NOT give steroids if epidural abscess suspected (will worsen infection)
- Definitive treatment: emergent radiation, surgical decompression, and/or chemotherapy based on tumor type
- Epidural abscess: emergent surgical drainage + IV antibiotics
- Epidural hematoma: reverse anticoagulation, emergent surgical evacuation
- Foley catheter for urinary retention
General Epidural Compression Syndrome Management
- Dexamethasone: at least 16 mg IV as soon as possible after assessment[5]
- Note: dexamethasone can be used to reduce compressive edema from epidural metastases, but is more likely to worsen an infection from spinal epidural abscess.
- Consult spine service
- Consider foley for bladder decompression
Disposition
- Admit all patients with confirmed or suspected cord compression
- ICU if hemodynamically unstable or rapidly progressing deficits
- Ambulatory status at time of diagnosis is the strongest predictor of outcome — patients who are still ambulatory have the best prognosis
See Also
- Epidural compression syndromes
- Cauda equina syndrome
- Spinal Cord Trauma
- Epidural abscess (spinal)
- Spinal cord syndromes
References
- ↑ Cohen MS, Wall EJ, Kerber CW, et al. The Anatomy of the Cauda Equina on CT Scans and MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73 (3): 381-84.
- ↑ Bradley WG. Neurology in Clinical Practice: Principles of diagnosis and management. P363
- ↑ Coleman WP, et al. A critical appraisal of the reporting of the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Studies (II and III) of methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury. J Spinal Disord 2000; 13:185.
- ↑ Hurlbert RJ. Methylprednisolone for acute spinal cord injury: An inappropriate standard of care. J Neurosurgery 2000; 93(1 Suppl):1
- ↑ Metastatic spinal cord compression: Diagnosis and management of patients at risk of or with metastatic spinal cord compression. Full Guideline. November 2008. Developed for NICE by the National Collaborating Centre for Cancer. ©2008 National Collaborating Centre for Cancer
