EBQ:Omeprazole in Bleeding Peptic Ulcers: Difference between revisions

(conclusion and patient demographics)
Line 17: Line 17:


==Conclusion==
==Conclusion==
High-dose infusion of omeprazole after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers substantially reduces the risk of recurrent bleeding.


==Major Points==  
==Major Points==  


==Study Design==
==Study Design==
 
*All investigators remained unaware of the patients’ treatment assignments until the study was completed.
==Population==
==Population==
===Patient Demographics===
===Patient Demographics===
'''Omeprazole vs. Placebo''' <br/>
Male: 66.7% vs. 66.7% <br/>
Age: 64 vs. 67 <br/>
Hemoglobin (g/dL): 9.4 vs. 9.5 <br/>
Location of ulcer:
:Stomach: 44% vs. 40%
:Duodenum: 54% vs. 54%
:Stoma: 2% vs. 6%
Endoscopic signs of bleeding:
:Spurting hemorrhage: 12% vs. 8%
:Oozing hemorrhage: 42% vs. 41%
:Nonbleeding visible vessel: 32% vs. 30%
:Clot with underlying vessel: 15% vs. 22%
Size of ulcer (cm): 1.2 vs. 1.1 <br/>
Previous ulcer disease: 32% vs. 38% <br/>
Previous ulcer bleeding: 30% vs. 30% <br/>
Recent use of H2 antagonist or PPI: 2% vs. 2% <br/>
Risk factor of bleeding peptic ulcer:
:H.pylori infection: 65% vs. 53%
:Use of NSAIDs: 33% vs. 33%
:Use of aspirin: 19% vs. 15%
:Use of warfarin: 4% vs. 4%
Development of bleeding during hospitalization: 18% vs. 19% <br/>
Pts with coexisting illnesses: 25% vs. 30%
===Inclusion Criteria===
===Inclusion Criteria===
 


===Exclusion Criteria===
===Exclusion Criteria===


==Interventions==  
==Interventions==  
*After endoscopic treatment, patients were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous infusion of placebo or omeprazole, given as an 80-mg bolus injection followed by a continuous infusion of 8 mg per hour for a period of 72 hours.
**Identical-appearing vials of omeprazole and placebo were prepared with random numbers in blocks of 80
**Treatment was started in the recovery area of the endoscopy suite and continued in a surgical ward.
   
   
==Outcomes==
==Outcomes==

Revision as of 21:14, 4 September 2015

incomplete Journal Club Article
Lau JYW, et al. "Effect of Intravenous Omeprazole on Recurrent Bleeding after Endoscopic Treatment of Bleeding Peptic Ulcer". NEJM. 2000. 343(5):310-316.
PubMed Full text PDF

Clinical Question

Does high dose intravenous omeprazole reduce the incidence of recurrent bleeding in patients who have undergone endoscopic intervention for bleeding peptic ulcers?

Conclusion

High-dose infusion of omeprazole after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers substantially reduces the risk of recurrent bleeding.

Major Points

Study Design

  • All investigators remained unaware of the patients’ treatment assignments until the study was completed.

Population

Patient Demographics

Omeprazole vs. Placebo
Male: 66.7% vs. 66.7%
Age: 64 vs. 67
Hemoglobin (g/dL): 9.4 vs. 9.5
Location of ulcer:

Stomach: 44% vs. 40%
Duodenum: 54% vs. 54%
Stoma: 2% vs. 6%

Endoscopic signs of bleeding:

Spurting hemorrhage: 12% vs. 8%
Oozing hemorrhage: 42% vs. 41%
Nonbleeding visible vessel: 32% vs. 30%
Clot with underlying vessel: 15% vs. 22%

Size of ulcer (cm): 1.2 vs. 1.1
Previous ulcer disease: 32% vs. 38%
Previous ulcer bleeding: 30% vs. 30%
Recent use of H2 antagonist or PPI: 2% vs. 2%
Risk factor of bleeding peptic ulcer:

H.pylori infection: 65% vs. 53%
Use of NSAIDs: 33% vs. 33%
Use of aspirin: 19% vs. 15%
Use of warfarin: 4% vs. 4%

Development of bleeding during hospitalization: 18% vs. 19%
Pts with coexisting illnesses: 25% vs. 30%

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Interventions

  • After endoscopic treatment, patients were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous infusion of placebo or omeprazole, given as an 80-mg bolus injection followed by a continuous infusion of 8 mg per hour for a period of 72 hours.
    • Identical-appearing vials of omeprazole and placebo were prepared with random numbers in blocks of 80
    • Treatment was started in the recovery area of the endoscopy suite and continued in a surgical ward.


Outcomes

Primary Outcome

Secondary Outcomes

Subgroup analysis

Criticisms & Further Discussion

Funding

Sources