Likelihood ratios: Difference between revisions
(likely hood ratios and their bedside utility) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Likelihood Ratio Approximate Change in Probability (%)== | |||
Likelihood Ratio Approximate Change in Probability (%) | |||
Values between 0 and 1 decrease the probability of disease | Values between 0 and 1 decrease the probability of disease | ||
*0.1 −45% | |||
0.1 −45% | *0.2 −30% | ||
*0.3 −25% | |||
0.2 −30% | *0.4 −20% | ||
*0.5 −15% | |||
0.3 −25% | *1 - 0% | ||
0.4 −20% | |||
0.5 −15% | |||
1 - 0% | |||
Values greater than 1 increase the probability of disease | Values greater than 1 increase the probability of disease | ||
*2 +15% | |||
2 +15% | *3 +20% | ||
*4 +25% | |||
3 +20% | *5 +30% | ||
*6 +35% | |||
4 +25% | *7 8 +40% | ||
*9 10 +45% | |||
5 +30% | |||
6 +35% | |||
7 8 +40% | |||
9 | |||
| Line 43: | Line 25: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
==Source== | |||
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 August; 17(8): 647–650. | J Gen Intern Med. 2002 August; 17(8): 647–650. | ||
Revision as of 21:36, 21 November 2012
Likelihood Ratio Approximate Change in Probability (%)
Values between 0 and 1 decrease the probability of disease
- 0.1 −45%
- 0.2 −30%
- 0.3 −25%
- 0.4 −20%
- 0.5 −15%
- 1 - 0%
Values greater than 1 increase the probability of disease
- 2 +15%
- 3 +20%
- 4 +25%
- 5 +30%
- 6 +35%
- 7 8 +40%
- 9 10 +45%
An easy way to recall at the bedside by simply remembering 3 specific LRs 2, 5, and 10—and the first 3 multiples of 15 (i.e., 15, 30, and 45). An LR of 2 increases probability 15%, one of 5 increases it 30%, and one of 10 increases it 45%. For those LRs between 0 and 1, the clinician simply inverts 2, 5, and 10 (i.e., 1/2 = 0.5, 1/5 = 0.2, 1/10 = 0.1). Just as the LR of 2.0 increases probability 15%, its inverse, 0.5, decreases probability 15%. Similarly, an LR of 0.2 (the inverse of 5) decreases probability 30%, and a LR of 0.1 (the inverse of 10) decreases it 45%. These benchmark LRs can be used to approximate the remainder of Table 1.
Although this method is inaccurate for pretest probabilities less than 10% or greater than 90%, this is not a disadvantage, because these polar extremes of probability indicate diagnostic certainty for most clinical problems, making it unnecessary to order further tests (and apply additional LRs).
Source
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 August; 17(8): 647–650.
