EBQ:Validation of a prediction rule for the identification of children with intra-abdominal injuries after blunt torso trauma: Difference between revisions

Line 43: Line 43:


===Primary Outcomes===
===Primary Outcomes===
# The presence of intra-abdominal injury<br />
# Intra-abdominal injury requiring acute intervention, defined as: blood transfusion for intra-abdominal hemorrhage, angiographic embolization of vessel or organ, or therapeutic intervention at laparotomy.


===Secondary Outcomes===  
===Secondary Outcomes===  

Revision as of 17:45, 10 October 2014

incomplete Journal Club Article
Holmes J. et al. "Validation of a Prediction Rule for the Identification of Children With Intra-abdominal Injuries After Blunt Torso Trauma". Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2009. 54(4):528-33.
PubMed Full text PDF

Clinical Question

What is the accuracy of the prediction rule derived in the publication Holmes, JF et al. Identification of children with intra-abdominal injuries after blunt trauma. Ann Emerg Medicine. 2002;39:500-509. for detecting intra-abdominal injury in children after blunt torso trauma?

Conclusion

Major Points

Inclusion Criteria

  • <18 yr old
  • Blunt torso trauma
  • Underwent definitive testing for intra-abdominal injury: CT, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, diagnostic laparotomy or laparoscopy.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Penetrating trauma
  • Pregnant patients
  • Presentation >24hr after injury
  • Patients who did not undergo definitive testing because of low suspicion for intra-abdominal injury

Interventions

Outcome

Primary Outcomes

  1. The presence of intra-abdominal injury
  2. Intra-abdominal injury requiring acute intervention, defined as: blood transfusion for intra-abdominal hemorrhage, angiographic embolization of vessel or organ, or therapeutic intervention at laparotomy.

Secondary Outcomes

Subgroup analysis

Criticisms

Funding

UC Davis Children's Miracle Network Research Grant
SAEM Research Training Grant

Sources