Template:ACLS Narrow Irregular Tachycardia: Difference between revisions

Line 12: Line 12:
**Determine whether patient is better candidate for rate control or rhythm control <ref>Frankel, G. et al. (2013) Rate versus rhythm control in atrial fibrillation. Canadian Family Physician 59(2), 161 - 168</ref>
**Determine whether patient is better candidate for rate control or rhythm control <ref>Frankel, G. et al. (2013) Rate versus rhythm control in atrial fibrillation. Canadian Family Physician 59(2), 161 - 168</ref>
***Rate control preferred with:
***Rate control preferred with:
****Persistent A fib
****Persistent [[A fib]]
****Less symptomatic patients
****Less symptomatic patients
****Age 65 or older
****Age 65 or older
Line 20: Line 20:
****Patient preference
****Patient preference
***Rhythm control preferred with:
***Rhythm control preferred with:
****Paroxysmal or new A fib
****Paroxysmal or new [[A fib]]
****More symptomatic patients
****More symptomatic patients
****Age < 65 years
****Age < 65 years
****Heart failure clearly exacerbated by A fib
****Heart failure clearly exacerbated by [[A fib]]
****No history of rhythm control failure
****No history of rhythm control failure
****Patient preference
****Patient preference
Line 33: Line 33:
**Rhythm conversion with:
**Rhythm conversion with:
***Synchronized [[Cardioversion]] (120-200 J)
***Synchronized [[Cardioversion]] (120-200 J)
****Best performed on patients with new onset A fib or patients fully therapeutically anti-coagulated for > 3 weeks
****Best performed on patients with new onset [[A fib]] or patients fully therapeutically anti-coagulated for > 3 weeks
***[[Procainamide]] per [[EBQ:Ottawa Aggressive ED Cardioversion Protocol|Ottawa Aggressive ED Cardioversion Protocol]]
***[[Procainamide]] per [[EBQ:Ottawa Aggressive ED Cardioversion Protocol|Ottawa Aggressive ED Cardioversion Protocol]]

Revision as of 17:02, 30 July 2025

Narrow Irregular Tachycardia

  • Multi-focal atrial tachycardia (MAT)
    • Treat underlying cause (hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia)
    • Consider diltiazem
    • Avoid beta blockers unless they are already known to be tolerated, as airway disease often co-morbid
    • If not symptomatic and rate < 110/120 bpm, may not require treatment (e.g., patient with MAT secondary to COPD)
  • Sinus Tachycardia with frequent PACs
    • Treat underlying cause
  • A fib / A Flutter with variable conduction (see also Atrial Fibrillation with RVR)
    • Check if patient has taken usual rate-control meds
      • If missed dose, may provide dose of home medication and observe for resolution
    • Determine whether patient is better candidate for rate control or rhythm control [1]
      • Rate control preferred with:
        • Persistent A fib
        • Less symptomatic patients
        • Age 65 or older
        • Hypertension
        • No heart failure
        • Previous failure to cardiovert
        • Patient preference
      • Rhythm control preferred with:
        • Paroxysmal or new A fib
        • More symptomatic patients
        • Age < 65 years
        • Heart failure clearly exacerbated by A fib
        • No history of rhythm control failure
        • Patient preference
    • Rate control with:
    • Rhythm conversion with:
  1. Frankel, G. et al. (2013) Rate versus rhythm control in atrial fibrillation. Canadian Family Physician 59(2), 161 - 168