Maxillofacial trauma: Difference between revisions

(Text replacement - "Fx" to "fracture")
(Text replacement - "fx " to "fracture ")
Line 14: Line 14:
*Maxillary sinuses do not develop until 6 yr old (reduces midfacial fx)
*Maxillary sinuses do not develop until 6 yr old (reduces midfacial fx)
*Pediatric orbital floor is more pliable, more likely to lead to entrapment
*Pediatric orbital floor is more pliable, more likely to lead to entrapment
*Mandible fx requires prompt referral (1-2d) due to rapid bone remodeling
*Mandible fracture requires prompt referral (1-2d) due to rapid bone remodeling


==Clinical Features==
==Clinical Features==
Line 30: Line 30:
**Monocular diplopia suggets lens dislocation
**Monocular diplopia suggets lens dislocation
*Extraocular motion
*Extraocular motion
**Limitation on upward gaze occurs w/ fx of inf and medial orbital wall
**Limitation on upward gaze occurs w/ fracture of inf and medial orbital wall
*Pupil
*Pupil
**Teardrop sign (globe rupture), hyphema, reactivity (swinging flashlight test)
**Teardrop sign (globe rupture), hyphema, reactivity (swinging flashlight test)
Line 40: Line 40:
*Crepitus over any facial sinus suggests sinus fx
*Crepitus over any facial sinus suggests sinus fx
*[[Septal Hematoma]]
*[[Septal Hematoma]]
*Make sure simple nasal fx isn't a complex naso-orbito-ethmoid injury
*Make sure simple nasal fracture isn't a complex naso-orbito-ethmoid injury
===Ears===
===Ears===
*[[Auricular Hematoma]]
*[[Auricular Hematoma]]
Line 51: Line 51:
**Place finger in auditory canal while patient opens and closes jaw to detect condyle fx
**Place finger in auditory canal while patient opens and closes jaw to detect condyle fx
**Tongue blade test
**Tongue blade test
***95% Sn for no fx if can bite down hard enough to break it when twisted by examiner  
***95% Sn for no fracture if can bite down hard enough to break it when twisted by examiner  
**Jaw deviation due to mandible dislocation or condyle fx
**Jaw deviation due to mandible dislocation or condyle fx
***Chin will point away from dislocation, towards a fracture
***Chin will point away from dislocation, towards a fracture
Line 61: Line 61:


==Diagnosis==
==Diagnosis==
*Suspect midface fx > facial CT
*Suspect midface fracture > facial CT
*Suspect orbital floor fx > orbital CT
*Suspect orbital floor fracture > orbital CT
*Suspect mandibular fracture
*Suspect mandibular fracture
**Mandibular series
**Mandibular series
***Body fx > oblique view
***Body fracture > oblique view
***Angle/symphysis fx > PA view
***Angle/symphysis fracture > PA view
***Condyle fx > AP axial (Towne's) view
***Condyle fracture > AP axial (Towne's) view
*Plain Films
*Plain Films
**Water's view
**Water's view

Revision as of 04:52, 3 July 2016

Background

Prehospital Care

  • Assess patients ability to speak and protect the airway before and frequently during transport
  • Hematomas can significantly distort pharyngeal and facial anatomy making intubation or cricothyroidotomy difficult
  • Increased jaw mobility from a mid face fracture may help with intubation
  • Penetrating trauma to the lower third of the face frequently requires intubation or a surgical airway[1]
  • Place a protective shield over an eye suspected to have a ruptured globe
  • Patients should remain upright or reverse trendelenberg if there is oropharyngeal and nasal bleeding to avoid aspiration especially if placed in cervical protection
  • Temporizing hemostasis with oral and nasal packing in an intubated patient may help with persistent bleeding
  • Transport all avulsed pieces of the face including ears and nose

Pediatric Considerations

  • Cricothyrotomy is contraindicated in patients <8yr old
  • Maxillary sinuses do not develop until 6 yr old (reduces midfacial fx)
  • Pediatric orbital floor is more pliable, more likely to lead to entrapment
  • Mandible fracture requires prompt referral (1-2d) due to rapid bone remodeling

Clinical Features

Face

  • Numbness
    • Check supraorbital, infraorbital, and mental nerves
  • Assess Le Fort by rocking hard palate w/ one hand while stabilizing forehead w/ other

Eye

  • Exam
    • Bird's eye view for exophthalmos w/ retrobulbar hematoma
    • Worm's view for endophthalmos (blow-out fx) or malar prominence flattening (zygoma fx)
  • Acuity
  • Diplopia
    • Binocular diplopia suggests entrapment of EOM
    • Monocular diplopia suggets lens dislocation
  • Extraocular motion
    • Limitation on upward gaze occurs w/ fracture of inf and medial orbital wall
  • Pupil
    • Teardrop sign (globe rupture), hyphema, reactivity (swinging flashlight test)
  • Pressure (only if r/o globe rupture)
    • Check in patients w/ exophthalmos, afferent nerve defect or e/o retrobulbar hematoma
  • Fat through wound = septal perforation
  • Raccoon eyes

Nose

  • Crepitus over any facial sinus suggests sinus fx
  • Septal Hematoma
  • Make sure simple nasal fracture isn't a complex naso-orbito-ethmoid injury

Ears

Oral

  • Intraoral palpation of zygomatic arch to distinguish bony from soft tissue injury
  • Mandible Fracture
    • Place finger in auditory canal while patient opens and closes jaw to detect condyle fx
    • Tongue blade test
      • 95% Sn for no fracture if can bite down hard enough to break it when twisted by examiner
    • Jaw deviation due to mandible dislocation or condyle fx
      • Chin will point away from dislocation, towards a fracture
  • Malocclusion occurs in mandible, zygomatic, and Le Fort fx
  • Lacerations and mucosal ecchymosis suggests mandible fx

Differential Diagnosis

Maxillofacial Trauma

Diagnosis

  • Suspect midface fracture > facial CT
  • Suspect orbital floor fracture > orbital CT
  • Suspect mandibular fracture
    • Mandibular series
      • Body fracture > oblique view
      • Angle/symphysis fracture > PA view
      • Condyle fracture > AP axial (Towne's) view
  • Plain Films
    • Water's view
      • Orbital rims/floors, zygmatic arch, maxillary sinus, maxilla
    • Bucket handle view
      • zygomatic arches

Disposition

See Also

References

  1. Hollier L. et al. Facial gunshot wounds: A 4-year experience. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2011: 59:277-282