Harbor:Discrepancy Review Process
Discrepancy Review Process
- ENTERING ED PRELIM Read on non-contrast head CT's ONLY:
- “ED Prelim - WNL. Peterson 2320x”
- “ED Prelim - Small SDH R parietal area. Peterson 2320x”
- Be sure to click the button that says “Add new note” to enter your read.
- REVIEWING PRELIM DISCREPANCY LIST (QI function) Starting 10/1/18
- Synapse: DHS Enterprise Synapse => Conferences => Critical Findings => Ed Discrepancy
- If "Status" column says "completed", no further action needed
- Open radiology file
- Determine if discrepancy requires further action. Discuss with ED attending as needed
- Place note titled "Radiology Discrepancy Review" in patient's medical record describing action taken:
- I.e.: "CT Head from ED visit xx/xx/xx originally read as negative shows subacute cerebellar infarct. Patient needs an MRI, but transferred to outside hospital before one was done here. Called patient at xxx-xxx-xxxx, left message to call back at x3900-23202. Telegram sent. Discussed with Dr. Peterson"
- If no further action needed - note this in discrepancy review note.
- "Discrepancy on CT Head from xx/xx/xx noted - requires no further action. Discussed with Dr. Chappell"
- When f/up is finished, please mark as completed: Right click on case => shortcut status => completed
- File should be checked once per day for new cases.
- Synapse: DHS Enterprise Synapse => Conferences => Critical Findings => Ed Discrepancy
Peterson/Chappell 10/1/18
Discrepancy E-mail
To: smunn@dhs.lacounty.gov; BKalantari@dhs.lacounty.gov; amlikotic@dhs.lacounty.gov; jrees@dhs.lacounty.gov; rlewis@dhs.lacounty.gov; tlittle@dhs.lacounty.gov; cavaughn@dhs.lacounty.gov
On [Date], USROC contract radiologist [Radiologist Name] submitted an interpretation for a [type of study] for patient [last name, first name], MRUN [Insert MRUN].
After our review of the study and interpretation for clinical purposes, the Department of Emergency Medicine has identified the following potential quality problem(s): Accuracy of interpretation (may include omission of significant finding) Delay in interpretation Other (specify):
Following is relevant information on this case: [Insert clinical context and explanation of concern].
Therefore, we request that this study undergo a quality review as part of the Department of Radiology’s monitoring of the USROC contract.
Should you have questions on this matter, please do not hesitate to contact [Your Name] at [DHS Username]@dhs.lacounty.gov.
Thank you.
Dr. Lewis 5/2018
