Brief resolved unexplained event: Difference between revisions

Line 7: Line 7:
*BRUE is not related to [[SIDS]]
*BRUE is not related to [[SIDS]]
==Definition==
==Definition==
*BRUE diagnosis is only made by a clinician based on the features and is not based on the caregiver's perception of what happened. BRUE is an event occurring in an infant <1 year of age  when an observer reports a sudden, brief, and now resolved episode of ≥1 of the following:<ref name="aap"></ref>
BRUE diagnosis is only made by a clinician based on the features and is not based on the caregiver's perception of what happened. BRUE is an event occurring in an infant <1 year of age  when an observer reports a sudden, brief, and now resolved episode of ≥1 of the following:<ref name="aap"></ref>
*Cyanosis or pallor
*Cyanosis or pallor
*Absent, decreased, or irregular breathing
*Absent, decreased, or irregular breathing

Revision as of 00:41, 9 May 2016

Background

  • BRUE was formally known as Apparent life-threatening event (ALTE)[1]
  • BRUE definition has a strict age limit unlike ALTE and a BRUE should only be considered if there is not other likely explanation.
  • Peak incidence: 1wk - 2mo
  • BRUE is a symptom and requires evaluation for the actual diagnosis causing the event
  • Only 10% have repeat events
  • BRUE is not related to SIDS

Definition

BRUE diagnosis is only made by a clinician based on the features and is not based on the caregiver's perception of what happened. BRUE is an event occurring in an infant <1 year of age when an observer reports a sudden, brief, and now resolved episode of ≥1 of the following:[1]

  • Cyanosis or pallor
  • Absent, decreased, or irregular breathing
  • Marked change in tone (hyper- or hypotonia)
  • Altered level of responsiveness

A BRUE should only be diagnosed when there is no explanation for a the event after full history and physical

Risk Factors

  • RSV infection
  • Prematurity
  • Recent anesthesia
  • GERD
  • Airway/maxillofacial anomalies
  • Age < 10 wks
  • Hx of apneas
  • Pallor, cyanosis, feeding difficulties

Clinical Features

Episode that is frightening to caregiver and involves combination of:

  • Apnea
  • Color change
  • Muscle tone change
  • Choking or gagging

Pertinent History

The history in an BRUE should focus extensively on the details surrounding the event, need for resuscition, prior events, possible related medical conditions, or historic findings that may indicate prior events.

Past Medical History

  • Prematurity, history of apnea, prior resp/feeding difficulties?
  • Immunization status (particularly pertussis)

Family HIstory

  • History of SIDS, cardiac abnormalities, seizures, or metabolic disease?

Event

  • Duration of the BRUE
  • Was resuscitation with CPR and rescue breaths required?
  • What was the temporal relationship with feeding, sleeping, crying, vomiting, or choking
  • Any episodes concerning for central versus obstructive patterns of apnea
  • Any progressive or episodic changes in mental status

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis is quite extensive and although a broad workup is often started in the ED including evaluation for sepsis and occult infecetions and metabolic disorders, a cause is infrequently found[2]

Common[3]

  • Idiopathic (~50%)
  • GERD
  • Seizure
  • Respiratory tract infection
  • Misinterpretation of benign process (e.g. periodic breathing)
  • Vomiting/choking episode

Less Common

  • Pertussis
  • Inflicted injury
  • Poisoning
  • Serious bacterial infection
    • Must consider in all febrile pts with BRUE
  • Electrolyte abnormality (includes glucose)

Uncommon

Diagnosis

Individualize testing by history and exam

  • CBC
  • Chem 10
  • UA
  • CXR
  • Pertussis nasal swab
  • RSV nasal swab
  • Consider:
    • UCx/BC
    • ECG
    • LP
    • LFTs
    • MRI Brain

Management

  • Stable patients without a clear diagnosis
    • No evidence-based guidelines for proper w/u dispo decision
  • Stable patients with a clear diagnosis
    • Manage according to identified disease

Empiric Treatment for Unstable Patients

Medication/Intervention Indication Dose/Size (for neonate)
Glucose Hypoglycemia 5–10 mL/kg of 10% dextrose in water IV
3% normal saline Symptomatic hyponatremia 3–5 mL/kg bolus IV
Calcium Hypocalcemia 50–100 milligrams/kg calcium gluconate or 20 milligrams/kg calcium chloride IV
Cefotaxime Infection 50 milligrams/kg IV
Ampicillin Infection 50 milligrams/kg IV
Packed red blood cells Anemia 10 mL/kg IV
Normal saline Hypotension, dehydration 20 mL/kg IV
10% dextrose in one fourth normal saline Metabolic disease 1.5 maintenance (6 mL/kg/h for the first 10 kg)
Endotracheal intubation Hypoventilation or frequent apnea 3mm for preemie; 3mm for term neonate, 4mm for older infant

Disposition

Admission in most cases

Especially for:

  • <48wk postconceptual age
  • Ill-appearing
  • Bronchiolitis or pertussis w/ apnea
  • >1 event in past 24hr or multiple BRUE
  • Abnormalities in PMH
  • Prolonged central apnea >20s
  • BRUE requiring resus
  • Family history of SIDS

Current Research

  • Neither of these decision rules have been validated

Mittal BRUE Decision Rule[4]

  • 300 Infants in a single center with 76% admission rate with 37 (12%) required significant intervention
Predictors for requiring intervention
  • Prematurity
  • Abnormal physical examination
  • Color change to cyanosis,
  • Absence of upper respiratory infection symptoms and the absence of choking
  • Negative predictive value: 96%
  • Specificity of 70.5%
  • 7 out of the 184 (3.8%) were incorrectly discharged

Kaji BRUE Decision Rule[5]

  • 832 patients from 4 different study sites, with a 79.2% admission rate
Predictors for requiring admission
  • Obvious need for admission:
    • Supplemental Oxygen requirement
    • Resuscitation
    • Hemodynamic Instability
    • Positive RSV or Pertussis test
  • Significant past medical history
    • Congenital heart disease
    • Down Syndrome
    • Previous Intubation
  • Chromosomal abnormaility
  • Chronic Lung Disease
  • > 1 BRUE in 24 hours
  • Negative predictive value of 96.5%
  • Sensitivity of 89% , a Specificity of 61.9% , and a calculated
  • 14 (2%) patients were incorrectly discharged

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Tieder et al. Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (Formerly Apparent Life-Threatening Events) and Evaluation of Lower-Risk Infants. Pediatrics. May 2016, Vol. 137(5)
  2. McGovern MC. et al. Smith MB. Causes of apparent life threatening events in children: a systemic review. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89(11):1043-1048
  3. Okada K et al. Discharge Diagnoses in infants with apparent life threatening event admissions and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Pediatric Emergency Care. 2012;28(1):17-21
  4. Mittal M. et al. A clinical decision rule to identify infants with apparent life-threatening events who can be safely discharged from the emergency department. Pediatric Emergency Care. 2012;28(7): 599-605
  5. Kaji A et al. Apparent life-threatening event: multicenter prospective cohort study to develop a clinical decision rule for admission to the hospital. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(4):379-387