Difference between revisions of "Sgarbossa's criteria"
(→Background) |
Ostermayer (talk | contribs) (I might have messed up with template and deleted the article. good catch!!) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Criteria== | ==Criteria== | ||
− | + | {{Sgarbossa Criteria}} | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==Example of all 3 criteria== | ==Example of all 3 criteria== |
Revision as of 21:46, 21 April 2014
Contents
Background
- Assesses likelihood that pt w/ chest pain and baseline LBBB has myocardial damage
- Criteria also applies to LBBB due to paced rhythm
- Low sensitivity, high specificity
- Still consider PCI/t-PA for pts w/ LBBB and "good story" despite not meeting the criteria
Criteria
Original Criteria
≥3 points = 98% probability of STEMI[1]
- ST elevation ≥1 mm in a lead with upward QRS complex (concordant) - 5 points
- ST depression ≥1 mm in lead V1, V2, or V3 - 3 points
- ST elevation ≥5 mm in a lead with downward QRS complex (discordant) - 2 points
Smith's modification[2]
- Changes the 3rd rule of original Sgarbossa's Criteria to be ST depression OR elevation discordant with the QRS complex and with a magnitude of at least 25% of the QRS
- Increases Sn from 52% → 91% at the expense of reducing Sp from 98% → 90%
Example of all 3 criteria
See Also
External Links
1. http://lifeinthefastlane.com/ecg-library/basics/sgarbossa/
2. http://emcrit.org/podcasts/left-bundle-branch-block/
Source
- Sgarbossa, American Heart Journal 2006
- Sgarbossa, NEJM, February, 1996