Difference between revisions of "Talk:Warfarin reversal"

Line 7: Line 7:
 
The background section seems to imply that the fourth section should be "Major Bleeding, INR >20, and Toxic Ingestion."  And, the third section should be INR 10-20.  Is that correct? - Ross
 
The background section seems to imply that the fourth section should be "Major Bleeding, INR >20, and Toxic Ingestion."  And, the third section should be INR 10-20.  Is that correct? - Ross
  
I agree the whole background section was just wrong.  I added in more useful information [[User:Ostermayer|Daniel Ostermayer]] ([[User talk:Ostermayer|talk]])
+
I agree the whole background section was just wrong.  I added in more useful information -[[User:Ostermayer|Daniel Ostermayer]] ([[User talk:Ostermayer|talk]])

Revision as of 22:57, 30 March 2014

Multiple citations

Do we need the triple reference for each category of INR reversal? It is all the same article -Dan

We can remove the 3 references. I wasn't sure the best way to reference. - Ross

Background Section

The background section seems to imply that the fourth section should be "Major Bleeding, INR >20, and Toxic Ingestion." And, the third section should be INR 10-20. Is that correct? - Ross

I agree the whole background section was just wrong. I added in more useful information -Daniel Ostermayer (talk)