Difference between revisions of "Talk:Warfarin reversal"

(Multiple citations: new section)
 
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Multiple citations ==
 
== Multiple citations ==
 +
Do we need the triple reference for each category of INR reversal? It is all the same article -Dan
 +
 +
We can remove the 3 references.  I wasn't sure the best way to reference. - Ross
 +
 +
==Background Section==
 +
The background section seems to imply that the fourth section should be "Major Bleeding, INR >20, and Toxic Ingestion."  And, the third section should be INR 10-20.  Is that correct? - Ross
  
Do we need the triple reference for each category of INR reversal? It is all the same article -Dan
+
I agree the whole background section was just wrong.  I added in more useful information -[[User:Ostermayer|Daniel Ostermayer]] ([[User talk:Ostermayer|talk]])

Latest revision as of 17:34, 31 October 2015

Multiple citations

Do we need the triple reference for each category of INR reversal? It is all the same article -Dan

We can remove the 3 references. I wasn't sure the best way to reference. - Ross

Background Section

The background section seems to imply that the fourth section should be "Major Bleeding, INR >20, and Toxic Ingestion." And, the third section should be INR 10-20. Is that correct? - Ross

I agree the whole background section was just wrong. I added in more useful information -Daniel Ostermayer (talk)