Appendicitis (peds): Difference between revisions
(→Workup) |
|||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
[[File:CAT scan demonstrating acute appendicitis.jpg|thumb|Dialated appendix and stranding in the setting of acute appendicitis.]] | [[File:CAT scan demonstrating acute appendicitis.jpg|thumb|Dialated appendix and stranding in the setting of acute appendicitis.]] | ||
===Workup=== | ===Workup=== | ||
====Laboratory Findings==== | |||
*Abdominal panel | *Abdominal panel | ||
**CBC | **CBC | ||
*** | ***<10K is a negative predictor of appendicitis | ||
***However, normal WBC does not rule-out appendicitis | |||
**Chemistry | **Chemistry | ||
**Consider LFTs + lipase | **Consider LFTs + lipase | ||
| Line 67: | Line 69: | ||
*Consider urine pregnancy (age appropriate) | *Consider urine pregnancy (age appropriate) | ||
*[[Urinalysis]] | *[[Urinalysis]] | ||
**7-25% of patients with appendicitis have [[sterile pyuria]] | |||
*Consider [[serum lactate]] | *Consider [[serum lactate]] | ||
====Imaging==== | |||
''Consider in intermediate or higher risk patients'' | |||
*[[Ultrasound: Abdomen|Ultrasound]] | |||
**Sn: 88%, Sp: 94% | |||
**Consider as 1st choice in non-obese children | |||
**Indeterminate [[ultrasound]] and an Alvarado <5 (see below) has an NPV of 99.6%<ref>Blitman, et al. Value of focused appendicitis ultrasound and Alverado score in predicting appendicitis in children: Can we reduce the use of CT? AJR. 2015; 204:W707-W712.</ref> | |||
*CT with IV contrast | |||
**Sn: 94%, Sp: 95% | |||
**Consider if ultrasound is equivocal '''OR''' strong suspicion despite normal ultrasound | |||
===Diagnosis=== | ===Diagnosis=== | ||
| Line 109: | Line 122: | ||
'''Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC)''' | '''Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC)''' | ||
*pARC score shown to outperform Pediatric Appendicitis Score. pARC score accurately assesses risk of appendicitis in children age 5 years and older in community EDs <ref>Cotton D, et al., Validation of the Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC) in a Community Emergency Department Setting. Annals Emrg. Med. 2019; 74(4) 471-480</ref> | *pARC score shown to outperform Pediatric Appendicitis Score. pARC score accurately assesses risk of appendicitis in children age 5 years and older in community EDs <ref>Cotton D, et al., Validation of the Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC) in a Community Emergency Department Setting. Annals Emrg. Med. 2019; 74(4) 471-480</ref> | ||
==Management== | ==Management== | ||
Revision as of 20:53, 14 February 2024
This page is for pediatric patients. For adult patients, see: appendicitis
Background
- Most common between 9-12yr
- Perforation rate 90% in children <4yr
- NPV of 98% achieved if:
- Lack of nausea (or emesis or anorexia)
- Lack of maximal TTP in the RLQ
- Lack of neutrophil count > 6750
Clinical Features
- Local tenderness + McBurney's point rigidity most reliable clinical sign
Neonates
Infants (30 days - 2 yrs)
- History
- Physical
- Diffuse abdominal tenderness
- Localized RLQ TTP occurs <50%
- Diffuse abdominal tenderness
Preschool (2 - 5yrs)
- History
- Vomiting (often precedes pain)
- Abdominal pain
- Fever
- Anorexia
- Physical
- RLQ tenderness
School-age (6 - 12yrs)
- History
- Vomiting
- Abdominal pain
- Fever
- Anorexia
- Physical
- RLQ tenderness
Adolescents (>12yrs)
- Present similar to adults
- RLQ pain
- Vomiting (occurs after onset of abdominal pain)
- Anorexia
Differential Diagnosis
Pediatric Abdominal Pain
0–3 Months Old
- Emergent
- Nonemergent
3 mo–3 y old
- Emergent
- Nonemergent
3 y old–adolescence
- Emergent
- Nonemergent
Evaluation
Dilated, non-compressible appendix with appendicolith and surrounding free fluid[1]
Workup
Laboratory Findings
- Abdominal panel
- CBC
- <10K is a negative predictor of appendicitis
- However, normal WBC does not rule-out appendicitis
- Chemistry
- Consider LFTs + lipase
- Consider coagulation studies (PT, PTT, INR), as a marker of liver function
- CBC
- Consider urine pregnancy (age appropriate)
- Urinalysis
- 7-25% of patients with appendicitis have sterile pyuria
- Consider serum lactate
Imaging
Consider in intermediate or higher risk patients
- Ultrasound
- Sn: 88%, Sp: 94%
- Consider as 1st choice in non-obese children
- Indeterminate ultrasound and an Alvarado <5 (see below) has an NPV of 99.6%[2]
- CT with IV contrast
- Sn: 94%, Sp: 95%
- Consider if ultrasound is equivocal OR strong suspicion despite normal ultrasound
Diagnosis
Pediatric Risk Scores
Pediatric Appendicitis Score
| Nausea/vomiting | +1 |
| Anorexia | +1 |
| Migration of pain to RLQ | +1 |
| Fever | +1 |
| Cough/percussion/hopping tenderness | +2 |
| RLQ tenderness | +2 |
| Leucocytosis (WBC > 10,000) | +1 |
| Neutrophilia (ANC > 7,500) | +1 |
- Score ≤ 2
- Low risk (0-2.5%)
- Consider discharge home with close follow up
- Score 3-6
- Indeterminate risk
- Consider serial exams, consultation, or imaging
- Score ≥ 7
- High risk
- Consider surgical consultation
Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC)
- pARC score shown to outperform Pediatric Appendicitis Score. pARC score accurately assesses risk of appendicitis in children age 5 years and older in community EDs [3]
Management
- NPO
- IVF (20 mL/kg boluses)
- Analgesia
- Antibiotics
- Ampicillin/sulbactam OR cefoxitin
- Penicillin allergy?
- Gentamicin + (clindamycin OR
- metronidazole)
- Perforation or complicated appendicitis[4]
- IV antibiotic regimen as below:
- Ampicillin 100 mg/kg/d q6hr, max 8 g per dose AND
- Gentamicin 5 mg/kg QD, max 300 mg AND
- Metronidazole 30 mg/kg/d q8hr, max 1.5 g
- Daily doses of ceftriaxone and metronidazole just as effective:
- Ceftriaxone 50 mg/kg, max 2 g QD AND
- Metronidazole 30 mg/kg, max 1.5 g QD
- IV antibiotic regimen as below:
Disposition
- Admission
See Also
References
- ↑ http://www.thepocusatlas.com/pediatrics/
- ↑ Blitman, et al. Value of focused appendicitis ultrasound and Alverado score in predicting appendicitis in children: Can we reduce the use of CT? AJR. 2015; 204:W707-W712.
- ↑ Cotton D, et al., Validation of the Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC) in a Community Emergency Department Setting. Annals Emrg. Med. 2019; 74(4) 471-480
- ↑ Yardeni D et al. Single daily dosing ceftriaxone and metronidazole vs standard triple antibiotic regimen for perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Jun; 43(6): 981–985.